Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter > where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > I tried this today, applied my patch fo

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and > > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, stil

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter > where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the

git mailing list (Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3)

2005-04-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter > where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of t

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest > thing is to cp -r yo

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter > where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > In other words, that index file simply _cannot_ be shared. Don't even > > think about it. Only madness will ensue. > > If I use git in my home directory I cannot _help_ but share it. > Sometimes I'm using it from a BE box, sometimes from a LE bo

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > I've already noticed GNU interactive tools (googling for git), but > > it's Linus' choice of name. Alternative suggestions welcomed. What > > about 'gt'? ;-) > > 'gt' or 'gi' both sound fine - 'gi' being a bit faster to type ;-). > (Even 'get

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 07:38 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared. > > However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff. > For each _view_ you do need to have view-specific data, and the view index > very much is tha

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I'd even like to see support for using multiple branches checked out of > the same .git/ repository. David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared. However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff. For ea

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 Ã 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit : > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work > > in fully git environment. > > Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, and the other thing is: > > > > $ git pull > > > > GNU Interactive Tools 4.3.20 (armv4l-rmk-linux-gnu), 20:02:38 Mar 7 2001 > > GIT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the > > terms of the GNU General Public License

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > I'll bet at the top of this you have a mktemp error. Indeed, thanks. -- Russell King Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > It's fine to share the objects database. If you want to share the > directory cache, you are doing something wrong, though. What do you > need it for? I want to _not_ care which machine I happen to be on when I use git repositories which live

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patc

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon > > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work > > in fully git environment. > > Maybe -

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work > in fully git environment. Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network bandwidth and disk space are free. Meanwhile, in the real world, it'd be re

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-13 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't > > forget to byteswap properl

Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, m

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon > > Linus' git, aimed at human u