On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter > where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and > > > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still requires cleaning though), > > > and then tried git pull. Umm, whoops. > > > > Here's an updated patch which allows me to work with a BE-based > > cache. I've just used this to grab and checkout sparse.git. > > > > Note: it also fixes my glibc-2.2 build problem with the nsec > > stat64 structures (see read-cache.c). > > > > --- cache.h > > +++ cache.h Wed Apr 13 11:23:39 2005 > > @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ > > #include <openssl/sha.h> > > #include <zlib.h> > > > > +#include <netinet/in.h> > > +#define cpu_to_beuint(x) (htonl(x)) > > +#define beuint_to_cpu(x) (ntohl(x)) > > +#define cpu_to_beushort(x) (htons(x)) > > +#define beushort_to_cpu(x) (ntohs(x)) > > + > > /* > > * Basic data structures for the directory cache > > * > > What do the wrapper macros gain us?
Nothing much - I don't particularly care about them. I thought someone might object to using htonl/ntohl directly. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
