On 7/27/20 5:31 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On behalf of the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board (TAB), I'd
like to announce the voting procedures for the 2020 TAB elections.
The pool of eligible voters will consist of the following:
1) All attendees of the Linux Plumbers conference (i.e. kern
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2019, at 2:26 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Friendly reminder that the TAB elections are coming soon:
>>
>> The Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board (TAB) serves as the
>> interface between the k
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 7:13 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board (TAB), I'd like to
> take this opportunity to announce the voting procedures for the 2019 TAB
> elections. As was announced[1], this year we are moving to electronic voting.
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 2:26 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Friendly reminder that the TAB elections are coming soon:
>
> The Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board (TAB) serves as the
> interface between the kernel development community and the Linux
> Foundation. The TAB ad
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:19:50AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 10/28/16 16:13, Frank Rowand wrote:
Hi Chris,
It's time for the annual question of: where do I find the TAB minutes?
I was sure I had a bookmark of the link, but I seem to have misplaced it.
Thanks,
Frank
and the answer is ?
On 10/28/16 16:13, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> It's time for the annual question of: where do I find the TAB minutes?
>
> I was sure I had a bookmark of the link, but I seem to have misplaced it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Frank
and the answer is ???
thanks.
--
~Randy
Hi Chris,
It's time for the annual question of: where do I find the TAB minutes?
I was sure I had a bookmark of the link, but I seem to have misplaced it.
Thanks,
Frank
On 10/28/16 12:39, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A few updates about the TAB election. It is scheduled for 5pm
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Final reminder and update:
>
> The TAB elections will be held at 6:00pm tomorrow evening, Monday
> October 26th during the evening booth-crawl and reception in the Park
> Studio room. We will start at 6:00 sharp. Don't be late.
>
> Agenda:
> 1
Final reminder and update:
The TAB elections will be held at 6:00pm tomorrow evening, Monday
October 26th during the evening booth-crawl and reception in the Park
Studio room. We will start at 6:00 sharp. Don't be late.
Agenda:
1) Welcome and brief summary of what the TAB does
2) Questions
3) Las
Reminder and update:
As described below, the TAB elections will be held next week with the
Linux Kernel Summit and the Korea Linux Forum. The election will be
held at 6:00pm Monday evening during the on-site evening reception.
Each candidate will have the opportunity to make a brief statement
befo
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2015 05:20, "Ric Wheeler" wrote:
>> >
>> > I would like to nominate Sage Weil with his consent.
>> >
>> > Sage has lead the ceph project since its inception, contributed to the
>> kernel as w
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2015 05:20, "Ric Wheeler" wrote:
> >
> > I would like to nominate Sage Weil with his consent.
> >
> > Sage has lead the ceph project since its inception, contributed to the
> kernel as well as had an influence on projects like openstack.
>
> Sa
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> [Resending because I messed up the first one]
>
> The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> Technical Advisory Board (TAB) are held every year[1]. This year the
> election will be at the 2015 Kernel Summit in Seoul, So
I would like to nominate Sage Weil with his consent.
Sage has lead the ceph project since its inception, contributed to the kernel as
well as had an influence on projects like openstack.
thanks!
Ric
On 10/06/2015 01:06 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
[Resending because I messed up the first one]
On 08/18/14 13:13, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> We still have only 3 nominations for 5 places, So we'll do a last call
> for nominations at 20:00 and if there are five or fewer, there won't be
> an election and the TAB will use its charter process to appoint people
> to fill any shortfall.
Please a
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 14:48 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year. Currently the
> election will be at the 2014 Kernel Summit in Chicago, USA, at one of
> the Joint events (probably on th
Elected to the TAB for a two year term at the National Museum of
Scotland event were:
Greg KH
Thomas Gleixner
Jonathan Corbet
Sarah Sharp
Matthew Garrett
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
M
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:55:16 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a serious note, James, I think you mis-spoke when you said that
> Andrew Morton's term was up this year.
In that case I hereby quit ;) My contribution to the TAB has been practically
zero and I don't expect that to
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 01:03 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > although I would worry about their members only being the ones voting on
> > the TAB for no other reason than the bias toward one distro only at this
> > point in time.
>
> Given the complaint was about the question of correct selection of vot
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:38:04PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hasn't the KS committee / TAB board vote rigging conspiracy theory been
> raised yet?
It's too easy. All you have to do is note the significant overlap
between the KS program committee and the TAB.
Program Committee
Jens Axboe, Or
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Right now it looks like we have a list of sane candidates up, which I
certainly would be willing to vote for. However, it would be a shame
that the credibility of the election is lost because of sticking to an
undemocratic voting
Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2007 03:45, Theodore Tso wrote:
As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not
like it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in
SPI. And somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
Given the huge overlap
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:59:09PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Ever watched a legislative assembly at work? A bad idea perhaps, but
> the best that has been discovered so far.
Sure, but a Debian mailing list where fanatics who have no job, no
life, but huge amounts of free time to post liter
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 07:18:36PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Just out of curiosity , have you had anyone nominate a really really
> large group ? Like say, anyone that has every send an email to lkml ?
Nope; I suspect someone who did that would just be ignored by the
program committee. We mi
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 22:18 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:12:56PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > Yes, as well as 12 committee members, of which 5 didn't even comply with
> > their own git commit requirement last time I checked.
>
> Note that the git commit metric is not
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:12:56PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Yes, as well as 12 committee members, of which 5 didn't even comply with
> their own git commit requirement last time I checked.
Note that the git commit metric is not a "requirement", but a way of
seeding the list of people to be co
On Friday 24 August 2007 03:45, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not
> > like it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in
> > SPI. And somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
>
> Given the huge overlap between SPI m
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Right now it looks like we have a list of sane candidates up, which I
> certainly would be willing to vote for. However, it would be a shame
> that the credibility of the election is lost because of sticking to an
> undemocratic voting procedure. A proced
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:12:56 +0200 Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:01:55 +0200
> >
> >> But replacing the flawed KS list with one based on actual
> >> contributors, from the git logs as I proposed last week, doesn't seem
> >> silly.
I agree.
> > to some
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:01:55 +0200
But replacing the flawed KS list with one based on actual
contributors, from the git logs as I proposed last week, doesn't seem
silly.
to some degree the KS list is based on that git logs thing ;)
Yes, as well as 12 committee member
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:01:55 +0200
> But replacing the flawed KS list with one based on actual
> contributors, from the git logs as I proposed last week, doesn't seem
> silly.
to some degree the KS list is based on that git logs thing ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Alan Cox wrote:
although I would worry about their members only being the ones voting on
the TAB for no other reason than the bias toward one distro only at this
point in time.
Given the complaint was about the question of correct selection of voters
replacing the somewhat flawed kernel summit
> although I would worry about their members only being the ones voting on
> the TAB for no other reason than the bias toward one distro only at this
> point in time.
Given the complaint was about the question of correct selection of voters
replacing the somewhat flawed kernel summit attendee test
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:57:35AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > The other part of the puzzle is in
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:10:40PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> To be brutally frank, I couldn't give a toss about choosing the perfect
> representational system for the TAB election. In true Open Source
> fashion, all I really care about is that we have a mechanism whereby
> committed people c
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 08:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > The other part of the puzzle is including
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
> >
> > As I said; what's wro
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:42:24 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > And very gameable of course. James proposal at least has the advantage of
> > simplicity, of drawing from a rough set of relevant people (far from
> > perfec
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> And very gameable of course. James proposal at least has the advantage of
> simplicity, of drawing from a rough set of relevant people (far from
> perfectly) and a certain amount of random changeover according to the KS
> of the year
>
>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:13:20PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Personally I am not sure whether SPI would be the right way to do it or
> not, I am a bit wary of it being too Debian biased, but I could be
> convinced otherwise.
I don't think it's the /perfect/ organisation by any means, but let's
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:54:14AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
My impression as an SPI member is that in practice most SPI members come
from the SPI projects [1], and due to Debian's size Debian developers
are the majority of SPI members.
That's true -- but bear in mind th
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:54:14AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> My impression as an SPI member is that in practice most SPI members come
> from the SPI projects [1], and due to Debian's size Debian developers
> are the majority of SPI members.
That's true -- but bear in mind that most SPI members
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
>
> As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> it is remotely hard
> How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree?
So you think people who send hundreds of small typo fixes are worth more
than say someone who spends 3 months writing a new driver and gets it in
with one commit ?
Curious
And very gameable of course. James proposal at least has the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
>
> As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> it is remotely hard
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
>
> As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> it is remotely hard
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And
somebody else takes car
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:34:34PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Andy Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > > > for that, as everyone on the
On 8/23/07, Andy Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it
> > > hardly seems worth the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it
> > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election.
>
> Exactly ... we want
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:05:21 -0400ve a bit more direct ability to make
> An SPI-like or Debian-like approach with pure democracy might look
> good on paper, but when you have companies donating hundreds of
> thousands of dollars and up to the organization, having a board which
> is elected by mobs
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:49:57PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Then you're misconstruing the interactions. A representational role
> would imply the ability to speak for the community and make promises on
> its behalf. That, as Ted has already said, can't happen. Instead, the
> value to the
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 19:45 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> > elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> > it's fair to say that while we try to advise
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> it's fair to say that while we try to advise the OSDL and now the LF
> with what the community would like, th
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:14:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's really just a represent the community type of role. The LF uses
> the TAB to get a sense of the community for various things they and
> their members are thinking. Conversely, the TAB was initially formed to
> get a set of sp
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 20:19 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:42:09PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:37:48PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:26:18PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:44:00PM
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 16:47 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> > Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
>
> Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS com
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:42:09PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:37:48PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:26:18PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:44:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:37:48PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:26:18PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:44:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > The elections for five
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:26:18PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:44:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > Technical Advisory Bo
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:44:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > election will be at the
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS committee members entitled
to vote?
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAI
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
The reasons for this may be obvious
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:58 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > > election will be a
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
> > >
> > > A
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> >
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:22 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > election will be at the 200
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> > of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thin
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thing
> exist for this process ?
Last year each nominee made a stat
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
>
> Anyone is eligible to st
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:56 -0500, Scott Preece wrote:
> On 8/22/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit i
On 8/22/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
>
> Anyone is eligible to stand for election,
72 matches
Mail list logo
