On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community. > > > > As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like > > it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And > > somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you. > > Ahh, I didn't realize you were suggesting making -them- do the work > instead of just stealing their model. I suppose that could work, > provided no one finds being an SPI member objectionable and they'd > provide us with their member list.
I currently object to becoming an SPI member due to a number of personal reasons at this point in time. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
