Hi all
I'm still running the same 4.9.8 Arch kernel I was a few days ago and
I haven't done any updates but I decided to run hdparm again, a few
times actually, and now I'm getting 120/125 MB/s again on my SABRE
lite, as I was under 4.9.0.
When I last ran hdparm I ran it a few times and all the r
Hi Gary
I'll hopefully get to try some different kernels tonight or tomorrow
night, otherwise it may have to wait until the weekend.
As for bisecting and cross-compiling (which I won't have time to try
again until this weekend), maybe not having cross-compilation working
won't be such an obstacle
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:02:40PM +, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> Thankfully there is an archive of older Arch ARM packages which should
> reduce the amount amount of bisection / compiling I may need to do and
> they have packages for most stable kernels between 4.9.0 and 4.9.8
>
> http://
am wrote:
>>> [Sorry for the top-post]
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>>
>>> Could you run 'git bisect' between kernel 4.9.0 and 4.9.8 to understand
>>> where this performance regression come from?
>>>
>>
gt; Could you run 'git bisect' between kernel 4.9.0 and 4.9.8 to understand
>> where this performance regression come from?
>>
>>
>> From: Dan MacDonald
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:31:10 PM
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Gary Bisson; Fabio Estevam; shawn...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: ARM imx.6 SATA speed regression
>>
>> (Fake) Reply to CC in relevant people.
4.9.8 to understand
> where this performance regression come from?
>
>
> From: Dan MacDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:31:10 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Gary Bisson; Fabio Estevam; shawn...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org
&
(Fake) Reply to CC in relevant people.
7 matches
Mail list logo
