This is one of the cross-compilation guides I tried and failed to get to work.
https://archlinuxarm.org/wiki/Distcc_Cross-Compiling It's been a year or two since I last tried to get distcc working. I followed all those instructions but packages would only ever compile locally. I can't remember what other guides I tried but that one was the most directly relevant and most likely to work as I use Arch on all my machines, x86 and ARM. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Dan MacDonald <allc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Fabio > > I've never used bisect before and I have thusfar failed to get ARM > cross-compilation to work so I'm a bit wary of having to spend several > days rebuilding Linux several times on my board. > > I think the first thing I need to do is to see what other archived > Arch kernel packages I can get - hopefully I can find packages for > 4.9.1, 4.9.2 etc. I would imagine that if I can find the stable > release post 4.9.0 where imx6 SATA speed took a nosedive, that will > make bisecting much faster. > > If anyone has an easy to follow, known working guide to setting up > cross-compilation from amd64 -> armv7h, that would be massively > helpful as none of the ones I have tried in the past have worked. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com> wrote: >> [Sorry for the top-post] >> >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> >> Could you run 'git bisect' between kernel 4.9.0 and 4.9.8 to understand >> where this performance regression come from? >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Dan MacDonald <allc...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:31:10 PM >> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: Gary Bisson; Fabio Estevam; shawn...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org >> Subject: Re: ARM imx.6 SATA speed regression >> >> (Fake) Reply to CC in relevant people.
