On Thursday 04 August 2005 23:45, Tommy Christensen wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As reported earlier, sometimes my home box don't want
> > to send anything.
> >
> > # ip r
> > 1.1.5.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 1.1.5.6
> > 1.1.4.0/24 dev if proto kernel scope link
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
Hi,
As reported earlier, sometimes my home box don't want
to send anything.
# ip r
1.1.5.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 1.1.5.6
1.1.4.0/24 dev if proto kernel scope link src 1.1.4.6
default via 1.1.5.5 dev tun0
# ping 1.1.4.1 -i 0.01
2005-08-02_19:12:18.19
On Monday 25 July 2005 08:17, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> I reported earlied that around linux-2.6.11-rc5 my home box sometimes
> does not want to send anything over ethernet. That report is repeated below
> sig.
>
> I finally managed to nail down where this happens.
> I instrumented sch_generic.c to
On Monday 25 July 2005 08:28, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Probably your link is never coming up. We won't send packets
> over the wire unless the device is in the link-up state.
>
> However, if ->dequeue() is returning NULL, there really aren't
> any packets in the device queue to be sent.
>
> If y
Probably your link is never coming up. We won't send packets
over the wire unless the device is in the link-up state.
However, if ->dequeue() is returning NULL, there really aren't
any packets in the device queue to be sent.
If you want, add more tracing to pfifo_fast_dequeue() since
that's alm
vs, please review and respond in 2 weeks. (vs is sick at the moment)
Thanks Adrian,
Hans
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>This patch contains possible cleanups including the following:
>- make needlessly global code static
>- plugin/compress/minilzo.c: many cleanups
>- remove or #if 0 the following unu
ok
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Dike
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 3:25 AM
To: Chris Wright
Cc: Jeff Dike; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Thanks, I'll p
Hello
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 04:24, Alexander Gran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a reiser4 partition on a local IDE disk. I opened a 130MB textfile
> with
> kwrite,
..
> Process was eating 100% CPU time for several (54) seconds.
> Is this a normal, expected behaviour?
no, thanks for report, I will
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:16:56AM +0100, Alexander Gran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after my external USB hdd disconnected itself reiser4 paniced. I dont think a
> journalingfs should panic if its device fails..
Panicking is sometimes what you want. Panic can trigger a reboot and
get the box back on its f
* Jeff Dike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Thanks, I'll push that with rest of audit changes.
>
> Applies on top of your changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.
Am Freitag, 4. März 2005 02:16 schrieb Alexander Gran:
> Hi,
>
> after my external USB hdd disconnected itself reiser4 paniced. I dont think
> a journalingfs should panic if its device fails..
Ähm correction: It's reiser4 on dm-crypto (aes) The crypto device is of cource
not radable either: Buffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Thanks, I'll push that with rest of audit changes.
Applies on top of your changes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.10/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
===
--- linux-2.6.10.orig/arch/um/
* Jeff Dike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I just did a more complete grep of the symbols that can get config'd
> > away (including CONFIG_AUDIT as well), and I think there's a few more
> > missing pieces. Sorry about that. Jeff, Ralf, Martin, these look ok?
>
> For UML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I just did a more complete grep of the symbols that can get config'd
> away (including CONFIG_AUDIT as well), and I think there's a few more
> missing pieces. Sorry about that. Jeff, Ralf, Martin, these look ok?
For UML, this is fine as far as it goes, but you're adding
Am Donnerstag, 3. März 2005 09:12 schrieb Vladimir Saveliev:
> > http://zodiac.dnsalias.org/misc/crashlog
>
> I get "You do not have permission to access this document." trying to
> access it.
wrong file permissions. fixxed by now. My mistake...
regards
Alex
--
Encrypted Mails welcome.
PGP-Key
Andrew Morton wrote:
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I observed an oddity on a nfs-mounted fs while using 2.6.11-rc5-mm1.
Could you try this please?
--- 25/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c~nfsacl-acl-umask-handling-workaround-in-nfs-client-fix
2005-03-02 08:49:59.0 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/fs/n
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 09:53, Andrew Morton wrote:
AurÃlien Francillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
cvs diff Makefile
cvs diff: cannot create read lock in repository
`/mnt/iseran/roca/cvsroot/ldpc': No such file or directory
cvs [diff aborted]: rea
Hello
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 21:32, Alexander Gran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whatever happens here, we need - at least - lower
> the amount of log generatet. This is not really handy...
> lsusb still lists the disk
> syslog can be found (as soon as syslogd finished...;) at
> http://zodiac.dnsalias.org/mis
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I observed an oddity on a nfs-mounted fs while using 2.6.11-rc5-mm1.
Could you try this please?
--- 25/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c~nfsacl-acl-umask-handling-workaround-in-nfs-client-fix
2005-03-02 08:49:59.0 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c 2005-03
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:57:03AM +0100, Alexander Gran wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 11:48 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > Alex, please use mailing lists...
>
> sorry, I was used to have reply-to set to the mailing list ;)
> double-checking next time..
>
> > Dominik, do we really always want t
Hello,
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 09:53, Andrew Morton wrote:
> AurÃlien Francillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > cvs diff Makefile
> > cvs diff: cannot create read lock in repository
> > `/mnt/iseran/roca/cvsroot/ldpc': No such file or directory
> > cvs [diff aborted]: read l
Hello
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Adrian> The current reiser4 help texts have two disadvantages: 1. they
> > Adrian> are more marketing speech than technical s
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1]$ grep PG_arch fs/reiser4/*.c
>> fs/reiser4/page_cache.c: page_flag_name(page, PG_arch_1),
>> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:assert("v
Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adrian> The current reiser4 help texts have two disadvantages: 1. they
> Adrian> are more marketing speech than technical speech with some
> Adrian> debatable statements 2. they are too long
>
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adrian> The current reiser4 help texts have two disadvantages: 1. they
Adrian> are more marketing speech than technical speech with some
Adrian> debatable statements 2. they are too long
Excellent patch, that help description has been tota
Aurélien Francillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Lots of tuning/balancing changes in the CPU scheduler. Mainly targetted
> > at larger SMT/SMP/NUMA machines. It's
On 03.01, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a problem that was introduced between 2.6.10-ac9 and 2.6.10-ac11 made
> it's way into 2.6.11-rc5. While taking a backup onto a SCSI-streamer one
> of my RAID1-arrays gets corrupted. Afterwards the system hangs and
> isn't even bootable. Need to raid
Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > - I seem to be getting a lot of patches which don't compile if you breathe
> > on the .config file, let alone if you try them on another architecture.
> > It
> > would be nice to receive less such patch
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 22:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:36 +0100, Mws wrote:
> > hi benjamin
> >
> > now i had some spare time to do some investigation
> >
> > booting the 2.6.11-rc5 with radeonfb.default_dynclk=0 or with -1
> > brings up a framebuffer console. ev
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:27:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >...
> > All 728 patches:
> >...
> > reiser4-rcu-barrier.patch
> > reiser4: add rcu_barrier() synchronization point
>
> Considering the patent situation at least in the USA, the
> EXPORT_
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - I seem to be getting a lot of patches which don't compile if you breathe
> on the .config file, let alone if you try them on another architecture. It
> would be nice to receive less such patches, please.
The ia64 audit bit is likely my fault from
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:36 +0100, Mws wrote:
> hi benjamin
>
> now i had some spare time to do some investigation
>
> booting the 2.6.11-rc5 with radeonfb.default_dynclk=0 or with -1
> brings up a framebuffer console. everything is fine.
> starting xorg-x11 with Ati binary only drivers just brin
On Mon, Feb 28, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Monday 28 February 2005 04:32, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
> >
> > Here is anot
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:18:56AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:55:29 GMT, Russell King said:
> > > The PCI updates change the prototype of a helper function for
> > > pci_bus_alloc_resource(), but don't touch the actual hel
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:55:29PM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:36:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:27:41 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
> >
> >
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:27:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> All 728 patches:
>...
> reiser4-rcu-barrier.patch
> reiser4: add rcu_barrier() synchronization point
Considering the patent situation at least in the USA, the
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_barrier) has to become an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
Linux 2.6 (mm tree) Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
KernelbzImage bzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
---
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:18:56AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:55:29 GMT, Russell King said:
> > The PCI updates change the prototype of a helper function for
> > pci_bus_alloc_resource(), but don't touch the actual helper function
> > in PCMCIA.
>
> That explains the
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:55:29 GMT, Russell King said:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:36:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This is still showing the same 'cs: unable to map card memory!' issue on my
> > Dell laptop. Backing out bk-pci.patch makes it work again.
> >
> > For what it's worth, the
Mathieu Segaud wrote:
Mathieu Segaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
The complete patch is attached
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c: In function `check_ctail':
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c:250: attention : l'adresse de ÃÂ ctail_ok ÃÂ sera toujours ÃÂv
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 15:36, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Mws wrote:
>
> >hi benjamin
> >
> >now i had some spare time to do some investigation
> >
> >booting the 2.6.11-rc5 with radeonfb.default_dynclk=0 or with -1
> >brings up a framebuffer console. everything is fine.
> >starting xorg-x11 with Ati
Mws wrote:
hi benjamin
now i had some spare time to do some investigation
booting the 2.6.11-rc5 with radeonfb.default_dynclk=0 or with -1
brings up a framebuffer console. everything is fine.
starting xorg-x11 with Ati binary only drivers just brings up a black screen
without a mouse cursor and fre
Mathieu Segaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
> Mathieu Segaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
>
> Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
> The complete patch is attached
as any time I post with no sleep for 3 days, more noodles than brain
are in my skull. Did tha wrong strip
Mathieu Segaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
The complete patch is attached
>
> fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c: In function `check_ctail':
> fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c:250: attention : l'adresse de ÃÂ ctail_ok
> ÃÂ sera toujours ÃÂvaluÃÂe comme Ã
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:36:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:27:41 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
>
> > - A pcmcia update which obsoletes cardmgr (although cardmgr still works
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
>
>
> - Lots of tuning/balancing changes in the CPU scheduler. Mainly targetted
> at larger SMT/SMP/NUMA machines. It's going to be hard to wor
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:27:41 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
> - A pcmcia update which obsoletes cardmgr (although cardmgr still works) and
> makes pcmcia work more like regular hotpluggable devices. See the
On Mon, Feb 28, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Monday 28 February 2005 04:32, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
> >
> > Here is anot
hi benjamin
now i had some spare time to do some investigation
booting the 2.6.11-rc5 with radeonfb.default_dynclk=0 or with -1
brings up a framebuffer console. everything is fine.
starting xorg-x11 with Ati binary only drivers just brings up a black screen
without a mouse cursor and freezes the
To: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc5-mm1
>
> Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 10:27 schrieben Sie:
> > - A pcmcia update which obsoletes cardmgr (although cardmgr still works)
> > and makes pcmcia work more like regular hotpluggable devices. See
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
hi,
dmesg shows this:
-- ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC3] enabled at IRQ 18
ACPI: PCI interrupt :01:0b.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, high) -> IRQ 18
ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xF0806080 ctl 0xF080608A bmdma 0xF0806000 irq 18
ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xF08060C0 ctl 0xF08060CA
On Monday 28 February 2005 04:32, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
>
> Here is another one, probably not new.
> Is riva_get_EDID_i2c a bit
On Saturday 26 February 2005 09:13, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 01:41 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
> > fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
>
> Ahhh, good catch ! I though that was fixed long ago, looks
On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
Here is another one, probably not new.
Is riva_get_EDID_i2c a bit too optimistic by not having a $i2cadapter_ok
member in riva_p
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 01:41 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
> > fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
>
> Ahhh, good catch ! I though that was fixed long ago, looks like I was
>
On Sat, Feb 26, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> mm/built-in.o(.rodata.cst4+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_ADDR32
> empty_zero_page+4000
> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20050203 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-9)
> GNU ld version 2.15
>
> Using gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I'm still curious what makes a difference between module and
> built-in.
There seems to be quite some difference between module and
built-in for framebuffer drivers. Quite some time ago I
reported a problem with nVidia framebuffer driver making the
screen go nuts
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:47 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
- sound: hasn't worked since FC1...
The ALSA lists have been deluged with reports like "sound worked in FC1,
upgraded to FC3, no sound". AFAICT it's just sloppiness on the part of
the Fedora userspace tools. For example,
> This patch has already been posted to linux-fbdev on 2005-02-10 by David
> Vrabel
> and made me ask
> Is there any reason why this has been originally flagged "__init"?
> "vesa_modes" is not "__init". That's why I changed "intelfb" to
> use "vesa_modes".
>
> Maybe time has co
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 01:41 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
> fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
Ahhh, good catch ! I though that was fixed long ago, looks like I was
wrong.
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
>>modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
>>fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
>
>
> Ack. Maybe somebody should run the scripts again to check that we don't
> reference __init data from non-init
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> sparse doesnt do that, yet? (I never looked at it.)
No, it doesn't look at the section info. I guess I could do it, but there
_is_ a "make buildcheck" which does it based on perl stuff and the link
information.
And I can do "make buildcheck" mysel
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:30 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > > > > fast_imageblit
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:21 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > > > fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> > > > fast_imageblit(2
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 21:24 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
>
> >
> > > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > > fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> > > fast_imageblit(269) j 1 fa51a800 0
> > > Unable to handle kernel pagi
> > It seem to detect the flat panel incorrectly, or the EDID data is bogus,
> > maybe that's wrecking something in the new modelist management in
> > fbdev ? It might be causing us to use a bogus mode that itself casues
> > atyfb to crash. Tried forcing a mode ?
>
> cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a
On Fri, Feb 25, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
> > fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
>
> Ack. Maybe somebody should run the scripts again to check that we don't
> reference _
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:30 +0100, Mws wrote:
> hi,
>
> i also have problems with 2.6.11-rc5 and radeon:
>
> i am using a ATI Radeon X600 PciExpress.
>
> a) now the console framebuffer seems to bee working, thx benjamin :)
> b) when bootup seq ist completed and i want to start X (xorg-x11) with
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> modedb can not be __init because fb_find_mode() may get db == NULL.
> fb_find_mode() is called from modules.
Ack. Maybe somebody should run the scripts again to check that we don't
reference __init data from non-init functions.
Linus
On Thu, Feb 24, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
>
> radeonfb oopses on intel.
> Havent checked yet when it started with it.
>
> AC
On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > > > fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> > > > fast_imageblit(269) j 1 fa51a800
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:47 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> - sound: hasn't worked since FC1...
>
The ALSA lists have been deluged with reports like "sound worked in FC1,
upgraded to FC3, no sound". AFAICT it's just sloppiness on the part of
the Fedora userspace tools. For example, last I heard
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 before
the final 2.6.11.
This time it's really supposed to be a quicki
On Fri, Feb 25, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
>
> >
> > > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > > fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> > > fast_imageblit(269) j 1 fa51a800 0
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at vir
On Fri, Feb 25, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> > fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> > fast_imageblit(269) j 1 fa51a800 0
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fa51a800
> >
> > is bitstart incorrec
> cfb_imageblit(320) dst1 fa51a800 base e0b8 bitstart 1999a800
> fast_imageblit(237) s daea4000 dst1 fa51a800
> fast_imageblit(269) j 1 fa51a800 0
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fa51a800
>
> is bitstart incorrect or is the thing just not (yet) mapped?
Looks like
On Fri, Feb 25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 08:08 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This time it'
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>
>Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
>conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
>networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 before
>the final 2.6.11.
>
>This time it's
hi,
i also have problems with 2.6.11-rc5 and radeon:
i am using a ATI Radeon X600 PciExpress.
a) now the console framebuffer seems to bee working, thx benjamin :)
b) when bootup seq ist completed and i want to start X (xorg-x11) with
ati-drivers
x is freezing - not your problem, but the con
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 08:08 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can,
> > > >
On Fri, Feb 25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
>
> radeonfb oopses on intel.
> Havent checked yet when it started
On Thu, Feb 24, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> > check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
>
> radeonfb oopses on intel.
> Havent checked yet when it started with it.
2.6.10
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> It looks like the v2.6.11-rc5 tag is on the same revisions as 2.6.10.
> patch-2.6.11-rc5 is an empty file, and patch-2.6.11-rc4-rc5 indicates
> that 2.6.11-rc5 reverted to 2.6.10:
The correct -rc5 patch (as opposed to the empty one) should be there
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 before
the final 2.6.11.
This time it's really supposed to be a quicki
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>
> Are you sure you uploaded the correct patch file ?
Yes, I uploaded the "correct" file, but I had broken my release-script,
and that file was broken and empty.
Will fix, sorry,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:39 +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:57:56 +0200 M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> And especially at this chunk:
>
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4/Makefile 2005-02-23 20:53:50.707759849 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc5/Makefile 2004-12-24 13:35:01.0 -0800
> @@ -1,7 +
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:57:56PM +0200, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >[...]
> >
> >Anyone know if the linux-2.6.11-rc5.tar.bz2 has all the changes in it?
> >The tarball rc5 is smaller than rc4. Was there a lot taken out?
>
> Take a look at the diffview of 2.6.11-rc4-rc5
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:57:56 +0200 M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Anyone know if the linux-2.6.11-rc5.tar.bz2 has all the changes in it?
> > The tarball rc5 is smaller than rc4. Was there a lot taken out?
>
> Take a look at the diffview of 2.6.11-rc4-rc5 incr
Linux 2.6 Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
Kernel bzImagebzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
--- --- --
On Wed, Feb 23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please
> check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
radeonfb oopses on intel.
Havent checked yet when it started with it.
ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:12.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low
Steven Rostedt wrote:
[...]
Anyone know if the linux-2.6.11-rc5.tar.bz2 has all the changes in it?
The tarball rc5 is smaller than rc4. Was there a lot taken out?
Take a look at the diffview of 2.6.11-rc4-rc5 incremental patch.
5599 files changed, 166396 insertions(+), 293627 deletions(-)
-- Stev
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:49 +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >Very small.
> >
> >[ ] patch-2.6.11-rc5.bz2 23-Feb-2005 20:20 14
> >[ ] patch-2.6.11-rc5.bz2.sign 23-Feb-2005 20:20 248
> >[ ] patch-2.6.11-rc5.gz23-Feb-2
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:18:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 befor
Quoting Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
> Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
> conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
> networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 before
> the final 2.6.11.
>
> This
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:18:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> Hey, I hoped -rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource
> conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in
> networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -rc5 before
> the fin
>This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can,
>please check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap.
Out of diskspace on kernel.org?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
[...]
patch-2.6.11-rc5.bz2 23-Feb-2005 20:20 14
patch-2.6.11-rc5.b
97 matches
Mail list logo
