Arnd,
在 2014年08月28日 04:17, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 07:41:43 Caesar Wang wrote:
+- clock-names : Shall be "tsadc_clk" for the transfer-clock, and "tsadc_pclk"
for
+the peripheral clock.
Why not just name them "clk" and "pclk"? The "tsadc" part seems highly
redundan
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 07:41:43 Caesar Wang wrote:
> +- clock-names : Shall be "tsadc_clk" for the transfer-clock, and
> "tsadc_pclk" for
> +the peripheral clock.
>
Why not just name them "clk" and "pclk"? The "tsadc" part seems highly
redundant.
Alternatively, how about "transfer" an
2 matches
Mail list logo