On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:45:15PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> BTW. Can't we kill __perf_addr() and the corresponding argument in
> perf_trace_buf_submit/perf_tp_event ?
>
> Or do you think it can have a new user?
Oh, right.. I suppose that was to enable tracepoints for fault (like)
events. Cle
On 08/12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So I suppose the down-side to putting them in TP_ARGS() is that you
> cannot use arbitrary expressions for them anymore; like:
>
> TP_ARGS(foo);
>
> TP_perf_assign(
> __perf_task(foo->ponies);
> __perf_count(foo->horses);
> ),
>
> Not that we actual
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:08:26PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/05, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry... should I resend once again ?
> >
> > Sure, why not. It's only 3 patches :-)
>
> OK. Added "v2" to avoid the confusion.
>
> The only change is
>
> - Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Ste
3 matches
Mail list logo
