On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:08:26PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/05, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry... should I resend once again ?
> >
> > Sure, why not. It's only 3 patches :-)
>
> OK. Added "v2" to avoid the confusion.
>
> The only change is
>
> - Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> + Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> + Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
>
> > I wonder if the Reviewed-by assumes the Acked-by?
>
> I dunno. But since you gave me both, I'd better preserve them all.
So I suppose the down-side to putting them in TP_ARGS() is that you
cannot use arbitrary expressions for them anymore; like:
TP_ARGS(foo);
TP_perf_assign(
__perf_task(foo->ponies);
__perf_count(foo->horses);
),
Not that we actually did something like that, but I imagine it might've
been useful.. A well, lets not worry too much about that and go with
this. We'll get creative again if we ever need something like that.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
