Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The main motivation was to have the arch in control of as much direct
> register writing as possible. Even though our HV does allow us to write
> to config space, it's not obviously safe for Linux to be flipping bits
> and also calling the HV to con
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 00:39 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's an arch detail whether MSI irqs need to be masked using the PCI
> > MSI registers.
>
> Agreed. It isn't an arch detail that they need to be unmasked in
> the pci configuration sp
Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's an arch detail whether MSI irqs need to be masked using the PCI
> MSI registers.
Agreed. It isn't an arch detail that they need to be unmasked in
the pci configuration space.
I assume this patch is motivated just to make arch support easier
an
3 matches
Mail list logo