Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

2013-03-20 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play > with. > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in

Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

2013-03-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easi

Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

2013-03-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play >> > with. >> > The amount of patches could be re

Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

2013-03-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play > > with. > > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments > > first

Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

2013-03-06 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play > with. > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in