On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play >>> > with. >>> > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments >>> > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in the >>> > Documentation folder. Similar description is scattered through the commit >>> > messages. >>> > >>> > Module was tested on Intel Medfield and Lynxpoint systems with dw_dmac DMA >>> > controller embedded. >>> Overall the series looks good. I think it can applied in this form as well. >> >> Viresh, so, you are the only one who speaks about reducing amount of >> patches. Do you think is better to either reduce, or leave as is? In >> case of go with smaller amount, could you provide simple scheme which >> patch should be merged with which?
> I have been damn busy with Linaro Connect last week and couldn't review all > patches too. Probably you can just go ahead with this patchset only as Vinod > is okay with it. It seems Vinod is on vacation. So, take your time to finish review. I appreciate it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
