On Friday, March 18, 2005 10:26 AM Grant Grundler wrote:
>> He was referring to an unpublished draft "Error Reporting ECN".
>> You'll have to talk to Intel's PCI-SIG representative to get a copy.
>
>Good News: the "Error Reporting ECN" is now posted on the PCISIG
website.
>
>Tom, please review and
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:12:07PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
...
> He was referring to an unpublished draft "Error Reporting ECN".
> You'll have to talk to Intel's PCI-SIG representative to get a copy.
Good News: the "Error Reporting ECN" is now posted on the PCISIG website.
http://ww
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:12:07PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Tom,
> > A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> > ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> > For example, the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Tom,
> A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
> the correctable er
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:38 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
>> >A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
>> >...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
>> >For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
>> >the correctable error status r
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:54:32PM -0800, Nguyen, Tom L wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:12 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
> >Tom,
> >A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> > ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> > For example, they do not
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:12 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
>Tom,
>A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
> the correctable error stat
Tom,
A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
the correctable error status register.
I believe he is referring to the "Error Clarif
On Friday, March 11, 2005 11:21 PM Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> -Report the errors to user.
>>
>This is done through the syslog, right? Is that acceptable?
Reporting the errors to user can be written automatically to
/var/log/messages or be manually consumed through the syslog. I am not
sure whether
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 04:10:28PM -0800, long wrote:
>
> - Report the errors to user.
This is done through the syslog, right? Is that acceptable?
It looks like you are logging a lot of stuff, all without a kernel log
level, which is going to really mess up syslog parsers.
Have you thought
10 matches
Mail list logo
