On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:12:07PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > > Tom, > > A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing): > > ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN. > > For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in > > the correctable error status register. > > > > I believe he is referring to the "Error Clarifications ECN": > > > > > > http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/pciexpress/ECN_-_Error_Clarifications.pdf > > Tom, > Sorry - I got this wrong. > He was referring to an unpublished draft "Error Reporting ECN". > You'll have to talk to Intel's PCI-SIG representative to get a copy. > [ Ugh. And everyone else is SOL - sorry ]
Then we have no obligation to be compliant with a unpublished spec :) greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
