On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 06:08:16PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > While allyes/mod/noconfigs do seem to work fine with KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
> > provisions, randconfig tramples all over the provided values at perhaps
> > not surprisingly, random.
>
> Please be
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Adrian mentioned a few weeks ago that KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is the way to
> go to ensure that things like allyes/allmod/allnoconfig work with a
> constrained set of symbols, with the implication that this holds
> true for randconfig as well.
BTW another p
2 matches
Mail list logo
