Hi,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Adrian mentioned a few weeks ago that KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is the way to
> go to ensure that things like allyes/allmod/allnoconfig work with a
> constrained set of symbols, with the implication that this holds
> true for randconfig as well.
BTW another possibility is to use all{no,mod,yes,random,}.config.
> While allyes/mod/noconfigs do seem to work fine with KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
> provisions, randconfig tramples all over the provided values at perhaps
> not surprisingly, random.
Please be careful with such broad statements, there is only an issue with
choice values.
> Debugging this a bit, there seemed to be two issues:
>
> - SYMBOL_DEF and SYMBOL_DEF_USER overlap, which made
> def_sym->flags the same regardless of whether we came from an
> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG path or not.
Look at how SYMBOL_DEF is used in confdata.c.
> - clobbering of the fixed value in conf_choice() by way of
> random() def assignment.
Simply add a test for is_new there.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
