On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100:
> > C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> > or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> > however, treats this
Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100:
> C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
> says that if
2 matches
Mail list logo
