On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote: > Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100: > > C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits > > or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation, > > however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also > > says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be > > printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think > > that would be particularly useful in these cases, so just remove the > > precision specifiers. > > Nice catch Rasmus, but I think a better patch would be one that adds the > missing precision (%.16llx).
The kernel much more commonly uses %016llx $ git grep "%016llx" | grep -v staging | wc -l 792 $ git grep "%\.16llx" | grep -v staging | wc -l 36 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
