On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:32 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:42 PM Nathan Chancellor
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > > Clang for now. Add a c
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:42 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
> >
> > Older clang's may work, but we will
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:02 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:42PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > > Clang for now. Add a compil
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:42PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
> >
> > Older clang's may work, but we
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
>
> Older clang's may work, but we will likely drop workarounds for older
> versions.
>
> Link: https://github.com/
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:26 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:17:34PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > > Clang for now. Add a
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:01 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
> >
> > Older clang's may work, but we will likely
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
>
> Older clang's may work, but we will likely drop workarounds for older
> versions.
I think this part of
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:17:34PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
>
> Since this effectively enforces a mini
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
Since this effectively enforces a minimum version for Clang, I'd
also update `Documentation/process/changes.rst` a
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:14:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this.
>
> Older clang's may work, but we will likely drop workarounds for older
> versions.
>
> Link: https://git
11 matches
Mail list logo