On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com> wrote: > > During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of > Clang for now. Add a compile time check for this. > > Older clang's may work, but we will likely drop workarounds for older > versions. > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/9 > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/941 > Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>
Nice to see This Is Happening! See also my other replies to Kees and Nathan comments. Acked-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> - Sedat - > --- > include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > index cee0c728d39a..7338d3ffd240 100644 > --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h > @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@ > #error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-clang.h> directly, include > <linux/compiler.h> instead." > #endif > > +#define CLANG_VERSION (__clang_major__ * 10000 \ > + + __clang_minor__ * 100 \ > + + __clang_patchlevel__) > + > +#if CLANG_VERSION < 100001 > +# error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it. > +#endif > + > /* Compiler specific definitions for Clang compiler */ > > /* same as gcc, this was present in clang-2.6 so we can assume it works > -- > 2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d-goog >
