Re: [PATCH] UDF: possible usage of uninitialized variables

2007-05-23 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[Jan Kara - Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:29:38PM +0200] | > A few variables could be used without being explicitly initialized. | > Fixed. | > | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > --- | > | > | > balloc.c |6 +- | > super.c |5 - | > 2 files changed, 9 insertio

Re: [PATCH] UDF: possible usage of uninitialized variables

2007-05-23 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[Jan Kara - Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:29:38PM +0200] | > A few variables could be used without being explicitly initialized. | > Fixed. | > | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > --- | > | > | > balloc.c |6 +- | > super.c |5 - | > 2 files changed, 9 insertio

Re: [PATCH] UDF: possible usage of uninitialized variables

2007-05-22 Thread Jan Kara
> A few variables could be used without being explicitly initialized. > Fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > > balloc.c |6 +- > super.c |5 - > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/balloc.c b/balloc.c > index

Re: [PATCH] UDF: possible usage of uninitialized variables

2007-05-22 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 22 May 2007 21:52:23 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few variables could be used without being explicitly initialized. > Fixed. Are you sure? I'm expecting that this is a gcc mistake. > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > > balloc.c |