> A few variables could be used without being explicitly initialized.
> Fixed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> 
> 
>  balloc.c |    6 +++++-
>  super.c  |    5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/balloc.c b/balloc.c
> index 4cec910..be37393 100644
> --- a/balloc.c
> +++ b/balloc.c
> @@ -744,7 +744,11 @@ static int udf_table_new_block(struct super_block * sb,
>       uint32_t spread = 0xFFFFFFFF, nspread = 0xFFFFFFFF;
>       uint32_t newblock = 0, adsize;
>       uint32_t elen, goal_elen = 0;
> -     kernel_lb_addr eloc, goal_eloc;
> +     kernel_lb_addr eloc;
> +     kernel_lb_addr goal_eloc = {
> +             .logicalBlockNum = 0,
> +             .partitionReferenceNum = 0,
> +     };
>       struct extent_position epos, goal_epos;
>       int8_t etype;
  As I read the code, I don't think it can happen goal_eloc is used
unitialized. Also please diff the tree completely, not just the udf
directory..

> diff --git a/super.c b/super.c
> index 9b8644a..068a99c 100644
> --- a/super.c
> +++ b/super.c
> @@ -1358,7 +1358,10 @@ udf_load_partition(struct super_block *sb, 
> kernel_lb_addr *fileset)
>                       case UDF_VIRTUAL_MAP15:
>                       case UDF_VIRTUAL_MAP20:
>                       {
> -                             kernel_lb_addr ino;
> +                             kernel_lb_addr ino = {
> +                                     .logicalBlockNum = 0,
> +                                     .partitionReferenceNum = 0,
> +                             };
>  
>                               if (!UDF_SB_LASTBLOCK(sb))
>                               {
  This one seems correct. Thanks for fixing this.

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to