Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alex Stewart wrote:
>
> > The attached patch (against 2.4.0-test8) adjusts the code to only mark
> > the slave not present if a flashdisk is master, not vice-versa.
>
> So are you saying that the master is flash and slave is ATA?
No, that's not wha
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alex Stewart wrote:
> The attached patch (against 2.4.0-test8) adjusts the code to only mark
> the slave not present if a flashdisk is master, not vice-versa.
So are you saying that the master is flash and slave is ATA?
Did you read the ide.c about ()->ata_flash flags?
All
2 matches
Mail list logo