Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alex Stewart wrote:
>
> > The attached patch (against 2.4.0-test8) adjusts the code to only mark
> > the slave not present if a flashdisk is master, not vice-versa.
>
> So are you saying that the master is flash and slave is ATA?
No, that's not what I'm saying. The master is a traditional ATA disk
and the _slave_ is a flash disk:
hda: IBM-DMCA-21440, ATA DISK drive
hdb: SunDisk SDTB-128, ATA DISK drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hda: 2822400 sectors (1445 MB) w/96KiB Cache, CHS=700/64/63
hdb: 31360 sectors (16 MB) w/1KiB Cache, CHS=490/2/32
Take a look at the patch (it only changes two lines). It's pretty clear
what it fixes.
-alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
