Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-05 Thread rolv
> > > You need it for some new video cards (for example those cheap intel i810 boards > > > that are becoming extremely common). > > > > I got my i810 to work on Debian (kernel 2.0.34) without agpgart by setting > > a switch in the driver code. > > That limits you to 1Mb of video ram I believe >

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-04 Thread Alan Cox
> > You need it for some new video cards (for example those cheap intel i810 boards > > that are becoming extremely common). > > I got my i810 to work on Debian (kernel 2.0.34) without agpgart by setting > a switch in the driver code. That limits you to 1Mb of video ram I believe - To unsubscri

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-04 Thread rolv
> > - In the absence of any applications which actually do 3D rendering, is > > there any performance advantage to loading the agpgart module? > > You need it for some new video cards (for example those cheap intel i810 boards > that are becoming extremely common). I got my i810 to work on Deb

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-03 Thread Alan Cox
> - In the absence of any applications which actually do 3D rendering, is > there any performance advantage to loading the agpgart module? You need it for some new video cards (for example those cheap intel i810 boards that are becoming extremely common). > Absolutely _all_ the documentation I

Re: [PATCH] 2.2.18pre2: AGP and the i810

2000-09-03 Thread Steven N. Hirsch
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > First, thanks, Alan, for using the USB and AGP patches. You just > saved me a bunch of integration work. > > I'd like to suggest the below patches for the AGP i810 driver. > (snip) Gentlemen, After reading every f'ing bit of documentation I can f