Re: [PATCH][RFC v7] timekeeping: Ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled

2016-11-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:26:09 AM John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Chen Yu wrote: > > Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to > > the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is > > triggered when pm_trace is enabled, and we have fixed i

Re: [PATCH][RFC v7] timekeeping: Ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled

2016-11-10 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Chen Yu wrote: > Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to > the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is > triggered when pm_trace is enabled, and we have fixed it > in recent kernel. However it's improper in the first place > to ca

Re: [PATCH][RFC v7] timekeeping: Ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled

2016-11-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Chen Yu wrote: > Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to > the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is > triggered when pm_trace is enabled, and we have fixed it > in recent kernel. However it's improper in the first place > to call __timeke

Re: [PATCH][RFC v7] timekeeping: Ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled

2016-11-10 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2016-11-10 12:55:53, Chen Yu wrote: > Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to > the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is > triggered when pm_trace is enabled, and we have fixed it > in recent kernel. However it's improper in the first place > to call __