On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Starting Linux PPC64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 23 11:54:44 EDT 2007
Argh. PPC64. The typical thing that we break on all major NUMA
changes.
> EEH: PCI Enhanced I/O Error Handling Enabled
> PPC64 nvram contains 7168 bytes
> Zone PFN ranges:
> DMA 0 -> 1048576
>
On (24/08/07 11:45), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> >
> >
> >>After applying the patch, the call trace is gone but the kernel bug
> >>is still hit
> >>
> >
> >Yes that is what we expected. We need more information
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
After applying the patch, the call trace is gone but the kernel bug
is still hit
Yes that is what we expected. We need more information to figure out why
the kmalloc_node fails there. It should walk through all nod
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> After applying the patch, the call trace is gone but the kernel bug
> is still hit
Yes that is what we expected. We need more information to figure out why
the kmalloc_node fails there. It should walk through all nodes to find
memory.
I see that y
Mel Gorman wrote:
On (22/08/07 13:50), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:48:00 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This:
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2814,6 +2814,8 @@ static int __cpuinit process_zones(int c
return 0;
bad:
On (23/08/07 01:50), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I see call trace followed by the kernel bug with the 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
> kernel and have attached the boot log and config file.
>
For this one in the boot log;
Built 2 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping off. Total pag
On (22/08/07 13:50), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:48:00 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This:
> >
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
> > +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -2814,6 +2814,8 @@ static int __cpuinit process_zones(int c
> > return 0;
> > bad:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:50:10 +0530
> Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I see call trace followed by the kernel bug with the 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
> > kernel and have attached the boot log and config file.
> > ==
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:48:00 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This:
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
> +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2814,6 +2814,8 @@ static int __cpuinit process_zones(int c
> return 0;
> bad:
> for_each_zone(dzone) {
> + if (!populated_zone(zon
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:50:10 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I see call trace followed by the kernel bug with the 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
> kernel and have attached the boot log and config file.
>
> ===
> SLUB: Genslab
10 matches
Mail list logo
