-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 Ã 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit :
>
>>On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>>
>>>Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
>>>in fully git enviro
Russell King wrote:
Nothing much - I don't particularly care about them. I thought someone
might object to using htonl/ntohl directly.
Why would they?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > I tried this today, applied my patch fo
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
> > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, stil
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
> glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still requires cleaning though),
> and then tried git pull. Umm, whoops.
Here's an updated patch which allows me to work with a BE-
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of t
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 à 09:48 -0700, H. Peter Anvin a écrit :
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > On a related note, maybe kernel.org should host .torrent files (and
> > serve them) for the kernel git repository. That would ease the pain.
> >
>
> /me inflicts major bodily harm on Xav.
>
> There is a
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest
> thing is to cp -r yo
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
> where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you
Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 Ã 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit :
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that ne
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > In other words, that index file simply _cannot_ be shared. Don't even
> > think about it. Only madness will ensue.
>
> If I use git in my home directory I cannot _help_ but share it.
> Sometimes I'm using it from a BE box, sometimes from a LE bo
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I've already noticed GNU interactive tools (googling for git), but
> > it's Linus' choice of name. Alternative suggestions welcomed. What
> > about 'gt'? ;-)
>
> 'gt' or 'gi' both sound fine - 'gi' being a bit faster to type ;-).
> (Even 'get
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 07:38 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
>
> However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
> For each _view_ you do need to have view-specific data, and the view index
> very much is tha
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> I'd even like to see support for using multiple branches checked out of
> the same .git/ repository.
David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
For ea
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 Ã 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit :
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> > in fully git environment.
>
> Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
* Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, and the other thing is:
> >
> > $ git pull
> >
> > GNU Interactive Tools 4.3.20 (armv4l-rmk-linux-gnu), 20:02:38 Mar 7 2001
> > GIT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
> > terms of the GNU General Public License
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> I'll bet at the top of this you have a mktemp error.
Indeed, thanks.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> It's fine to share the objects database. If you want to share the
> directory cache, you are doing something wrong, though. What do you
> need it for?
I want to _not_ care which machine I happen to be on when I use git
repositories which live
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patc
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> > in fully git environment.
>
> Maybe -
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
>
> I tried this today, applied
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached,
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
bandwidth and disk space are free.
Meanwhile, in the real world, it'd be re
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 02:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> However, then I would also like to suggest replacing "unsigned int"
> and "unsigned short" with uint32_t and uint16_t, even though they're
> consistent on all *current* Linux platforms.
Agreed.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
forget to byteswa
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
> > forget to byteswap properl
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'd suggest making it big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
> forget to byteswap properly.
That's not a bad argument actually - especially as networking uses BE.
(and git is about networking, right?) 8)
--
Russell King
Li
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
>
Its pretty dependant on where VERSION is located. This patch fixes
that. (PS, I left the
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like
> usage.
Untar, make, add to path, pull, 'git diff' fails on PPC:
peach /home/dwmw2/git-pasky-base
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, m
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human u
34 matches
Mail list logo
