Hi Andrew,
Sorry for the late reply.
Le Thursday 25 April 2013 à 13:37 -0700, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> So what's the fix? This?
>
> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c~a
> +++ a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -500,9 +500,12 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
> goto err
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 04:52:42 -0500 Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:07:24PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:16:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > > That being said, "my" SN2 machine was previously running kernel 3.0.34
> > > > which has the old dmi_scan code
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:22:08PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for stepping in.
>
> Le Tuesday 23 April 2013 à 22:00 +, Luck, Tony a écrit :
> > > I don't have much knowledge about IA64 either. All I see is that while
> > > x86 implements memcpy_fromio() with memcpy [1],
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:07:24PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:16:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > That being said, "my" SN2 machine was previously running kernel 3.0.34
> > > which has the old dmi_scan code and it also said "DMI not present or
> > > invalid." Plus dmid
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:16:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > That being said, "my" SN2 machine was previously running kernel 3.0.34
> > which has the old dmi_scan code and it also said "DMI not present or
> > invalid." Plus dmidecode fails on this machine with:
> >
> > /sys/firmware/efi/systab:
On 2013-04-25 03:22, Jean Delvare wrote:
What is strange is that the call to memcpy_fromio was added a long
time ago, long before dmi_scan was enabled on ia64.
I think memcpy_fromio is used to copy bios data to a mem buffer to speed
up read access.
zduan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
> That being said, "my" SN2 machine was previously running kernel 3.0.34
> which has the old dmi_scan code and it also said "DMI not present or
> invalid." Plus dmidecode fails on this machine with:
>
> /sys/firmware/efi/systab: SMBIOS entry point missing
>
> So it might as well be that DMI support
Hi Tony,
Thanks for stepping in.
Le Tuesday 23 April 2013 à 22:00 +, Luck, Tony a écrit :
> > I don't have much knowledge about IA64 either. All I see is that while
> > x86 implements memcpy_fromio() with memcpy [1], ia64 implements it with
> > readb [2]. There must be a reason for that, and
> I don't have much knowledge about IA64 either. All I see is that while
> x86 implements memcpy_fromio() with memcpy [1], ia64 implements it with
> readb [2]. There must be a reason for that, and I can only suppose that
> memcpy on __iomem pointers doesn't work on IA64. If memcpy doesn't work
> th
Le Tuesday 23 April 2013 à 11:25 +0800, DuanZhenzhong a écrit :
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Duan, Andrew,
> >
> > I am looking at the following commit:
> >
> > commit 9f9c9cbb60576a1518d0bf93fb8e499cffccf377
> > Author: Zhenzhong Duan
> > Date: Thu Dec 20 15:05:14 2012 -0800
> >
> > drivers
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Duan, Andrew,
I am looking at the following commit:
commit 9f9c9cbb60576a1518d0bf93fb8e499cffccf377
Author: Zhenzhong Duan
Date: Thu Dec 20 15:05:14 2012 -0800
drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c: fetch dmi version from SMBIOS if it exists
And I am worried about calls to
11 matches
Mail list logo