> I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated
> thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing? That's a
> feature addition more than a bugfix?
No - the old behavior was crazy - someone with a multithreaded process might
well expect that if they call prctl(PF
On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error
> > > handling
> > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors,
> > >
> This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
> on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
> patch 3 is for action optional errors.
Naoya,
You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that
they deserve
3 matches
Mail list logo
