On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error > > > handling > > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, > > > and > > > patch 3 is for action optional errors. > > > > Naoya, > > > > You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) > > that > > they deserved a "Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org". I agreed, and still think > > the same > > way. > > Correct. AR error handling was added in v3.2-rc5, so adding > "Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v3.2+" is fine. I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing? That's a feature addition more than a bugfix? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
