Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-21 Thread Peter Williams
Con Kolivas wrote: Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Paraphrasing Jens Axboe: I don't think you can compare [plugsched with the plugio framework]. Yes they are both schedulers, but that's about where the 'similarity' stops. The CPU scheduler must be really fast, overhead must be kept to a minimum. For a di

Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-21 Thread Con Kolivas
Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Paraphrasing Jens Axboe: I don't think you can compare [plugsched with the plugio framework]. Yes they are both schedulers, but that's about where the 'similarity' stops. The CPU scheduler must be really fast, overhead must be kept to a minimum. For a disk scheduler, we ca

RE: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-21 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Paraphrasing Jens Axboe: > I don't think you can compare [plugsched with the plugio framework]. > Yes they are both schedulers, but that's about where the 'similarity' > stops. The CPU scheduler must be really fast, overhead must be kept > to a minimum. For a disk scheduler, we can affort to burn c

Re: [ckrm-tech] RE: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-21 Thread Shailabh Nagar
Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Hi Peter, I'm hoping that the CKRM folks will send me a patch to add their scheduler to plugsched :-) They are planning to release a patch against 2.6.10. But their patch wont stand alone against 2.6.10 and so it might be difficult for you to integrate their code into a

Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-21 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Jan 20 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:48 EST, "Marc E. Fiuczynski" said: > > Peter, thank you for maintaining Con's plugsched code in light of Linus' and > > Ingo's prior objections to this idea. On the one hand, I partially agree > > with Linus&Ingo's prior vie

RE: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-20 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Hi Peter, > I'm hoping that the CKRM folks will send me a patch to add their > scheduler to plugsched :-) They are planning to release a patch against 2.6.10. But their patch wont stand alone against 2.6.10 and so it might be difficult for you to integrate their code into a scheduler for plugsch

Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-20 Thread Peter Williams
Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: Peter, thank you for maintaining Con's plugsched code in light of Linus' and Ingo's prior objections to this idea. On the one hand, I partially agree with Linus&Ingo's prior views that when there is only one scheduler that the rest of the world + dog will focus on making

Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-20 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:48 EST, "Marc E. Fiuczynski" said: > Peter, thank you for maintaining Con's plugsched code in light of Linus' and > Ingo's prior objections to this idea. On the one hand, I partially agree > with Linus&Ingo's prior views that when there is only one scheduler that the > re

RE: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-20 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Peter, thank you for maintaining Con's plugsched code in light of Linus' and Ingo's prior objections to this idea. On the one hand, I partially agree with Linus&Ingo's prior views that when there is only one scheduler that the rest of the world + dog will focus on making it better. On the other ha

Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] plugsched-2.0 patches ...

2005-01-19 Thread Kasper Sandberg
its nice to see that this project is not dead after all :DD On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 12:23 +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > ... are now available from: > > > > as a single patch to linux-2.6.10 and at: > >