Hi Peter,
I'm hoping that the CKRM folks will send me a patch to add their scheduler to plugsched :-)
They are planning to release a patch against 2.6.10. But their patch wont stand alone against 2.6.10 and so it might be difficult for you to integrate their code into a scheduler for plugsched.
Thats true. The current CKRM CPU scheduler is not a standalone component...if it were made one, it would need a non-CKRM interface to define classes, set their shares etc.
However, we have not investigated the possibility of making our CPU scheduler a pluggable one that could be loaded into a kernel equipped with the plugsched patches AND the CKRM framework. This should be possible but not a high priority until there is more consensus for having CPU schedulers pluggable at all (we have more basic stuff to fix in our scheduler such as load balancing).
Of course, we're more than happpy to work with someone willing to chip in and make our scheduler pluggable.
-- Shailabh
Also, the CKRM scheduler only modifies Ingo's O(1) scheduler. It certainly would be interesting to have CKRM variants of the other schedulers. This points to a whole new level of 'plugsched' in that general O(1) schedulers need to support fair share plugins.
Marc
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/