On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> if I read the ext4 code correctly, you pass encrypted filenames to
> ext4fs_dirhash().
> These filenames are not encoded and therefore binary gibberish.
That's correct.
> Isn't this a problem for the ext4 hash functions? My
On Sep 30, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if I read the ext4 code correctly, you pass encrypted filenames to
> ext4fs_dirhash().
> These filenames are not encoded and therefore binary gibberish.
> Isn't this a problem for the ext4 hash functions? My fear is that these
Hi,
if I read the ext4 code correctly, you pass encrypted filenames to
ext4fs_dirhash().
These filenames are not encoded and therefore binary gibberish.
Isn't this a problem for the ext4 hash functions? My fear is that these hashes
are optimized
for ASCII strings and produce more collisions when
3 matches
Mail list logo