On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> 
> if I read the ext4 code correctly, you pass encrypted filenames to 
> ext4fs_dirhash().
> These filenames are not encoded and therefore binary gibberish.

That's correct.

> Isn't this a problem for the ext4 hash functions? My fear is that these 
> hashes are optimized
> for ASCII strings and produce more collisions when binary data is used as 
> input.

I'm not particularly worried.  In general, while the converse is true;
that hashes that assume that they are used for binary data might not
work as well for ASCII strings, the ext4 hash functions should work
fine for binary data.

                                        - Ted

Reply via email to