On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:18:53PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> Confirmed. I tried both pre2 and pre3
>
> 2.4.7-pre2 + 00_ksoftirqd-7 + your last "bug" patch --> boot failed
> 2.4.7-pre3 + 00_ksoftirqd-7 + your last "bug" patch --> boot ok
perfect.
> BTW, is there some kind of doc regarding
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:43:11 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
| > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
| > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
|
| can you apply this p
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> recompiled and it seems to work fine.
can you apply this patch on top of the ksoftirqd patch and see if you
can trigger the BUG() again when based on pr
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of tho
Bob_Tracy wrote:
>
> Andrea Arcangeli quoted:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > > > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > > > recompiled and it
Hi Andrew!
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Okay, here's the output of gdb:
> >
> > (gdb) x/10i 0xc0118028
> > 0xc0118028 : mov0x4(%esp,1),%eax
> > 0xc011802c : cmpl $0x0,0xc025c2e4
> > 0xc0118033 : jne0xc0118043
> > 0xc0118035 : mov0xc024af20(,%eax,4
Andrea Arcangeli quoted:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > > Too
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse fo
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > My money is on the unconditional sti()'s in the cyrix code.
>
> Possibly but the diff is wrong
But it'll still work :)
--- linux-2.4.6/init/main.c Wed Jul 4 18:21:32 2001
+++ lk-ext3/init/main.c Fri Jul 6 02:06:12 2001
@@ -523,8 +523,8 @@ asmlinkage void __init star
> My money is on the unconditional sti()'s in the cyrix code.
Possibly but the diff is wrong
> - cli();
> + save_flags(flags);
>>> cli() needed still
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
> boxen ;)
As Andrea's patches don'
And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
recompiled and it seems to work fine.
Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
boxen ;)
Thanks,
Thibaut
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am Donnerstag, den 05. Juli 2001:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> > booting failed with:
> >
> > kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
>
> do you have an
"Manfred H. Winter" wrote:
>
> ...
> > --- linux-2.4.6/kernel/softirq.c Wed Jul 4 18:21:32 2001
> > +++ lk-ext3/kernel/softirq.c Thu Jul 5 21:32:08 2001
> > @@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ static void tasklet_hi_action(struct sof
> > if (!tasklet_trylock(t))
> > B
Hi Alan!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
> > code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
> >
> > Anyone, any idea?
>
> None at all. There are odd items in your config - like khttpd which if
> involved m
Hi Andrew!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > kernel panic every time (see original post). My CPU is a MediaGX, and
> > Manfred's one is a 6x86MX. What about yours ?
> > After my first unsuccessful attempt with a 2.4.6-pre3, I tried several other
> > 2.4.6-preX and 2.4.5-acX kernels.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> > > booting failed with:
> > >
> > >
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> > booting failed with:
> >
> > kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
>
> do you have any problem with those patches applie
> > kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
>
> do you have any problem with those patches applied?
I don't
>
>
>ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.6pre5aa1/00_ksoftirqd-7
>
>ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.6pre5aa1
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> booting failed with:
>
> kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
do you have any problem with those patches applied?
ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/li
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Something I forgot to mention that I didn't see in any of the other
> > problem reports. In my case, the panic happens immediately after
> > "Calibrating delay loop" appears during the boot sequence.
>
> Duplicated here. Works fine on a non Cyrix processor with the same kerne
Alan Cox wrote:
> Intriguing its all Cyrix.
That was the first thing that hit me (stood out).
> What compiler, what processor choice in the build.
compiler:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
processor choice:
586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86MXCONFIG_M586
> It l
> Something I forgot to mention that I didn't see in any of the other
> problem reports. In my case, the panic happens immediately after
> "Calibrating delay loop" appears during the boot sequence.
Duplicated here. Works fine on a non Cyrix processor with the same kernel image.
Perhaps the folks
Hi!
On Wed, 04 Jul 2001, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
>
> I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> booting failed with:
>
> kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
> invalid operand:
> CPU:0
> EIP:0010:[]
> EFLAGS: 00010082
> eax: 001d ebx: c025bf80 ecx:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:18:46PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
> > code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
> >
> > Anyone, any idea?
>
> None at all. There are odd items in your config - like khttpd which if
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:52:43PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted a message 2 weeks ago regarding this bug, though I can't trigger the
> kernel panic every time (see original post). My CPU is a MediaGX, and
> Manfred's one is a 6x86MX. What about yours ?
> After my first unsucce
Something I forgot to mention that I didn't see in any of the other
problem reports. In my case, the panic happens immediately after
"Calibrating delay loop" appears during the boot sequence.
--Bob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Alan Cox wrote:
> > This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
> > code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
> >
> > Anyone, any idea?
>
> None at all. There are odd items in your config - like khttpd which if
> involved might explain why there are not m
> This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
> code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
>
> Anyone, any idea?
None at all. There are odd items in your config - like khttpd which if
involved might explain why there are not more reports.
-
To unsubscri
Hi,
I posted a message 2 weeks ago regarding this bug, though I can't trigger the
kernel panic every time (see original post). My CPU is a MediaGX, and
Manfred's one is a 6x86MX. What about yours ?
After my first unsuccessful attempt with a 2.4.6-pre3, I tried several other
2.4.6-preX and 2.4.5-a
Hello,
This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
Anyone, any idea?
PS: My other posts:
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0107.0/0018.html
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0106.
Hi!
I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
booting failed with:
kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS: 00010082
eax: 001d ebx: c025bf80 ecx: 0001 edx: c0206628
esi: c025bf80 edi: 0001 ebp: esp
33 matches
Mail list logo
