On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote: > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches, > recompiled and it seems to work fine. > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix > boxen ;) As Andrea's patches don't actually fix anything Cyrix related it's obvious that they just avoid the real bug instead of fixing it. It's a very useful datapoint though. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Arjan van de Ven
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Andrew Morton
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:20... Alan Cox
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.... Andrew Morton
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:20... Bob_Tracy
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.... Andrew Morton
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Manfred H. Winter
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Manfred H. Winter
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:206! Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: PROBLEM: [2.4.6] kernel BUG at softirq.c:20... Thibaut Laurent