[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[SNIP]
> It has been confirmed on two more laptops, one lkml post and another
> laptop here. But if we tested every driver change on every supported
> hardware model, progress would never occur.
Few other drivers have the potential to turn a perfectly functioning £300
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > This driver was merged from 2.2.x and needs some more cleanups. Horst
> > von Brand posted a patch on lkml against this driver, too, but his
> > cleanups had a bug in it, and weren't as terse with procfs as the
> > followi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This driver was merged from 2.2.x and needs some more cleanups. Horst
> von Brand posted a patch on lkml against this driver, too, but his
> cleanups had a bug in it, and weren't as terse with procfs as the
> following patch is...
Hum nobody has said anything to me ti
Le mar, sep 26, 2000, à 11:05:42 -0500, Jeff Garzik a écrit:
> This driver was merged from 2.2.x and needs some more cleanups. Horst
> von Brand posted a patch on lkml against this driver, too, but his
> cleanups had a bug in it, and weren't as terse with procfs as the
> following patch is...
Woo hoo, I found some time for kernel hacking :)
This driver was merged from 2.2.x and needs some more cleanups. Horst
von Brand posted a patch on lkml against this driver, too, but his
cleanups had a bug in it, and weren't as terse with procfs as the
following patch is...
Against 2.4.0-test9-p
5 matches
Mail list logo
