Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15 / 2.4.6-pre5

2001-06-22 Thread Walter Hofmann
Mike Galbraith schrieb am Freitag, den 22. Juni 2001: > > 6 5 1 77232 2692 2136 47004 560 892 2048 1524 10428 285529 2 98 0 >^ > Was disk running? (I bet not.. bet it stopped just after stall began) There was no dis

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15 / 2.4.6-pre5

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > Ok, I managed to press SysRq-T this time ond got a trace for my hang. > Symbols are resolved by klog. If you prefer ksymopps please tell me, I > used klog because ksymopps seems to drop all lines without symbols. Someone else might want that and/or a

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15 / 2.4.6-pre5

2001-06-22 Thread Walter Hofmann
Mike Galbraith schrieb am Donnerstag, den 21. Juni 2001: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1 >^ > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFF

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-22 Thread Walter Hofmann
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > FWIW, here is the vmstat output for the second (short) hang. Taken with > > ac14, vmstat 1 was started (long) before the hang and interrupted about > > five seconds after it. The machine has 128MB RAM and 256MB swap. > > >procs

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > One thing that _could_ be done about looping allocations is to steal > > a page from the clean list ignoring PageReferenced (if you have any). > > That would be a very expensive 'rob Peter to pay Paul'

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-22 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 >1 > > >

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1 > >

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Thursday 21 June 2001 21:50, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Thursday 21 June 2001 07:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFF

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-21 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Thursday 21 June 2001 07:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they > > > > can't block o

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Thursday 21 June 2001 07:44, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they > > > can't block on IO, so they loop insanely). > > > > Why doesn't the VM

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-21 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1 > >

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-20 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1 >^ > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocatio

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-20 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > 2 4 2 77084 1524 18396 66904 0 1876 108 2220 2464 66079 198 1 ^ > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they can't > block on IO, so the

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-20 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > > > I had already two crashes with ac15. The system was still ping-able, but > > login over the network didn't work anymore. > > > > The first crash happened after I started xosview and noticed that the

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-20 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > > > I had already two crashes with ac15. The system was still ping-able, but > > login over the network didn't work anymore. > > > > The first crash happened after I started xosview and noticed that the > > s

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-20 Thread Adam Sampson
Walter Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It hung when I tried to close a browser window after reading the > text in it for quite some time. No swapping was going on. I've just seen this as well (for the first time) with -ac15. I was playing music with madplay at the time, and then did a "fin

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-19 Thread Walter Hofmann
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > I had already two crashes with ac15. The system was still ping-able, but > login over the network didn't work anymore. > > The first crash happened after I started xosview and noticed that the > system almost used up the swap (for no apparent reason).

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-19 Thread Walter Hofmann
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Walter Hofmann wrote: > I had already two crashes with ac15. The system was still ping-able, but > login over the network didn't work anymore. > > The first crash happened after I started xosview and noticed that the > system almost used up the swap (for no apparent reason).

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-17 Thread Walter Hofmann
I had already two crashes with ac15. The system was still ping-able, but login over the network didn't work anymore. The first crash happened after I started xosview and noticed that the system almost used up the swap (for no apparent reason). The second crash happened shortly after I started fsc

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-16 Thread Tom Vier
mach_kbd_rate was changed to kbd_rate, but not defined. vt.c: In function `vt_ioctl': vt.c:504: `kbd_rate' undeclared (first use in this function) vt.c:504: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once vt.c:504: for each function it appears in.) vt.c:510: `kbd_rate' used prior to declaration

Linux 2.4.5-ac15

2001-06-15 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org 2.4.5-ac15 o Enable MMX extensions on Cyrix MII (me) o Make pid on core dump configurable (B