Hi!
> > >Is read access safe ?
> >
> > Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> > nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
>
> Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
> disk controller that cau
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Thank you for a reply, but I don't think it's just the ide stuff which
broken. ext2fs is also broken and I suspect that all the rest is broken too.
It looks like there was a single change which affected all the modules...
> Working to clean all the modul
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
> > and ext2fs be
Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
> and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I hav
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
Don't be silly. I do not use RedHat (I do my own distribution, KSI Linux)
and their mkinitrd is just a script. Furthermore, I don't have ext2fs in the
kernel so their mkinitrd won't work. I do not have ide in the kernel
either...
> As I don't use i
As I don't use initrd at all I am a bit out of my depth here but according
to Documentation/Changes you need a new mkinitrd and the version suggested
seems to be 2.8-1. Checking my up-to-date RedHat 7.0 workstation it has
mkinitrd version 2.6-1, so this might be your problem?
Best regards,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I have
the following output:
=== Cut ===
ide-mod.o: Can't handle sections of type 32131
ide-probe-mod.o: Can't hand
> does that mean, if I apply ac11 I have already the same like pre9 patch
> plus you patches?
Yes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Alan
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> o Resync with Linus 2.4.1pre9
does that mean, if I apply ac11 I have already the same like pre9 patch
plus you patches?
I know, its not the most intelligent question, but nobody could tell me...
rgds
Luc de Louw
-
To unsubscribe from this
At 17:03 24/01/01, Timur Tabi wrote:
>** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Jan
>2001 16:54:36 +
>
> > >Is read access safe ?
> >
> > Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> > nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTF
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
> disk controller that cause data to become overwritten, even when it's just
> supposed to read that data?
IMHO the NTFS driver creators weren't bloody newbies and won't do such
a bug, even not by acc
** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Jan
2001 16:54:36 +
> >Is read access safe ?
>
> Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
Isn't it still theo
At 15:05 24/01/01, Cataldo Thomas wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 2.4.0-ac11
> > o Major NTFS updates (Anton Altaparmakov)
>
>Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to it
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> Slightly delayed because I had take some time out to fall off a horse..
>
>
> 2.4.0-ac11
> o Major NTFS updates (Anton Altaparmakov)
Is read access safe ?
I would
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Slightly delayed because I had take some time out to fall off a horse..
2.4.0-ac11
o Raid5 corruption fix(Neil Brown)
o Add Etrax 'cris' architecture support (Axis)
o APIC cra
15 matches
Mail list logo
