Timur Tabi wrote: > Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the > disk controller that cause data to become overwritten, even when it's just > supposed to read that data? IMHO the NTFS driver creators weren't bloody newbies and won't do such a bug, even not by accidence. Also I think there might be a VFS protection of R/O space, but I'm not sure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux 2.4.0ac11 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Cataldo Thomas
- NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux ... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re... Timur Tabi
- Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was... mirabilos
- Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was... Pavel Machek
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Luc de Louw
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Andre Hedrick
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin