On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote:
> I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a
> workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so
> far.
Also consider using Andrew Tridgell's
dbench/tbench/smbtorture suit
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:30:35PM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote:
> I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> http://lse.sourcefo
Bruce Allan wrote:
>
> Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> > http://lse.sourceforge.net to po
Hello Andrew,
You would need contact one of the administrators of the LSE project for this.
You would need a developer id for uploading. You can get all the information
from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lse/.
I think it will be very helpful to have the results including lockmeter
and kernpro
> "AMT" == Andrew M Theurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AMT> I would like to help improve SMP scalability on this workload. If you
AMT> have questions or comments about the above results, or if you are
AMT> conducting similar tests, please send email to
AMT> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have some ide
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
>
> Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
And you might like to try 2.4.4 (I saw 2.4.
Andrew Theurer wrote:
> I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> http://lse.sourceforge.net to post the test data.
The Netfinit
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
>
> Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
>
> Alan
Not yet. As I understand it, we need a supported ni
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:30:35PM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote:
> I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> http://lse.sourcefo
I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
http://lse.sourceforge.net to post the test data.
Andrew Theurer
Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> On
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote:
>
> I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a
> workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so
> far.
Do you have any kernel profile or lock contention data?
--
Mike Kravetz
Hello,
I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a
workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so
far. I would appreciate comments and any suggestions for improving
scalability on this workload.
The environment consists of an Intel Profusion based SMP
13 matches
Mail list logo
