On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > > I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a > workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so > far. Do you have any kernel profile or lock contention data? -- Mike Kravetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench Andrew M. Theurer
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench Mike Kravetz
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbenc... Andrew M. Theurer
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability,... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Net... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and... Andrew M. Theurer
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and... Chris Evans
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability,... Dipankar Sarma
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalabil... David Collier-Brown
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability,... Maneesh Soni
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench Kenichi Okuyama
- Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench Bruce Allan