On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > > > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> > > > without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that.
On Tue, Oct 10 2000, Mar
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:20:07PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> > > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> > > without problems as well. I've even
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:42:51PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > > > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > > > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> > > > without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that.
> > >
> >
Sorry if you get multiple copies of this--I have tried sending twice
already and have yet to see it on the kernel-list.
Jordan
Here are hdparms for all my devices--
`hdparm -i /dev/hda` IBM Deskstar 7200 RPM:
/dev/hda:
Model=IBM-DTLA-307075, FwRev=TXAOA50C, SerialNo=YS0YSF3Z455
Config={ Hard
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:20:07PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> > without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that.
>
> uh, what part of
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 07:21:05AM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> Everything is working great! I can access my hard drive quickly, both
> CD drives are working and I can read and write to my zip as a
> partitioned drive or as a block device for Tar archives. Thanks for all
> of the help.
Great. Thanks
Hi!
Ok, that means Andre's patch works. Congrats, Andre! Now, could you send
me 'hdparm -i /dev/hdb' for the ZIP? It seems to be in SWDMA0 mode,
which is interesting, because I thought it can't do that. You probably
have some newer model.
Do all your drives work correctly now?
Thanks for your e
I am currently booted into a 2.4.0-test10-pre1 kernel with two
modifications, the VIA 3.6 drivers you have provided and the Patch from
Andre that you sent. My IBM is the primary master with the zip as its
slave and the Kenwood is the secondary master with the Plextor as its
slave. Here is my /pr
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 04:27:04AM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> I have tried moving the Kenwood CDROM and the Zip between channels and
> this works well. I would get rid of the zip if it was a viable option
> but need it to do transfers, and the IBM has a real UDMA 66 cable and
> upto ATA 100 capabilit
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wir
I have tried moving the Kenwood CDROM and the Zip between channels and
this works well. I would get rid of the zip if it was a viable option
but need it to do transfers, and the IBM has a real UDMA 66 cable and
upto ATA 100 capability so I wanted to take advantage of it. Thanks to
all that helpe
Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> without problems as well. I've even
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:10:06AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> These are two different issues.
> One is host side detection and the other is drive side
> detection/acknowledgement.
>
> ide0=ata66 overrides the host-rules
>
> ivb-byte93 overrides the mixed drive side rules.
>
> The only think
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > Also I need to adjust the rules for "ignore byte93" because the the
> > various methods that are being supported.
>
> Yes, it would be nice if we had some better guesses on whether
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Also I need to adjust the rules for "ignore byte93" because the the
> various methods that are being supported.
Yes, it would be nice if we had some better guesses on whether to think
the 80-wire cable is present. It would also be
Also I need to adjust the rules for "ignore byte93" because the the
various methods that are being supported.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Try the "ignore byte93" option in the IDE menu. The IBM doesn't try to
> do UDMA66 because the ZIP drive kills its 80-wire cable detection
>
I have been using the 2.4..0 test series for quite some time now on a
machine with Redhat 6.2 and gcc 2.95.2 running on a Pentium III 733
Flip-Chip on a Tyan Trinity 400 (S1854) Motherboard. Until the recent
kernels my IBM 75 GB 7200 RPM Deskstar would only use PIO transfer modes
and only my Kenw
17 matches
Mail list logo
