On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote: > Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a > > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable > > without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that. > ^^^ > ??? Really ??? Are they trying to save money by doing that?? Yes, I'd guess so. Anyway, if the cable is indeed less than say 5-inch long, I think there is no reason this couldn't work. The crosstalks and delays are minimal in this situation ... -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Andre Hedrick
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Markus Pfeiffer
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Jordan
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596... Jordan
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt8... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt8... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt8... Jordan
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Andre Hedrick
- Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b Vojtech Pavlik