Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-15 Thread Danny ter Haar
I experimented some further today. using some printk i found out is was setting Fullduplex, hardcoded that to half-duplex (mine is connected to a hub and not a switch) , and it's configuration was 100Mbit as it was supposed to. Then i started looking at the start_xmit code and got lost :-))) Ho

Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-12 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:50:10PM +0100, Danny ter Haar wrote: > eth0: PCnet/FAST III 79C973 at 0xfce0, 00 00 e2 24 41 1d > pcnet32: pcnet32_private lp=c3c42000 lp_dma_addr=0x3c42000 assigned IRQ 9. > pcnet32.c:v1.25kf 26.9.1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] same chip works for me von my P5 SMP box. > ir

Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-12 Thread Danny ter Haar
Hans Grobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> lspci -vx output: >What about the other devices? ok, here's the full listing : 00:00.0 Host bridge: Cyrix Corporation PCI Master Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0 00: 78 10 0

Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-12 Thread Hans Grobler
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Danny ter Haar wrote: > According to Hans Grobler: > > If you're willing, would you please follow "REPORTING-BUGS" and send some > > more info. Also cat /proc/interrupts. This one's intriging... Thanks for the report (still studying it). > lspci -vx output: > > 00:0f.0 Ether

PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-12 Thread Danny ter Haar
According to Hans Grobler: > If you're willing, would you please follow "REPORTING-BUGS" and send some > more info. Also cat /proc/interrupts. This one's intriging... In short: Cyrix Multimedia box Everything onboard, including ethernet. Works as supposed to under 2.2.x (including 2.2.19pre7) i

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Hans Grobler
Hi Danny, If you're willing, would you please follow "REPORTING-BUGS" and send some more info. Also cat /proc/interrupts. This one's intriging... -- Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Does this patch help at all? Nope, unfortunatly it didn't > filename="pcnet32.patch" pcnet32_probe_pci: found device 0x001022.0x002000 ioaddr=0x00fce0 resource_flags=0x000101 PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:0f.0 PCnet chip version is 0x22

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Danny ter Haar wrote: > > >Jan 11 12:45:49 multimedia kernel: eth0: pcnet32_start_xmit() called, csr0 07f3. > >Jan 11 12:46:01 multimedia last message repeated 12 times > > hot from the ethernet wire: more info just arrived: > > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > eth0: transmit timed o

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
>Jan 11 12:45:49 multimedia kernel: eth0: pcnet32_start_xmit() called, csr0 07f3. >Jan 11 12:46:01 multimedia last message repeated 12 times hot from the ethernet wire: more info just arrived: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: transmit timed out, status 07f3, resetting. Ring data

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Alan Cox
> cyrix processor, chipset and amd/lance ethernet chipset onboard. > It' working fine with 2.2.x but not with 2.4.x kernels with > the same driver version of the pcnet32 networkdriver. What problems do you see - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There's a "reporting problems" section at the end >of Documentation/networking/vortex.txt. Should help. okidoki, have read it, thanks >Probably the most important thing is inserting the driver >module with `debug=7', opening the device, sending some >t

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Danny ter Haar wrote: > > According to Andi Kleen: > > "Doesn't work" isn't a very useful bug report. What happens exactly? > > Do the RX/TX/error counters increase when you try to send packets? > > no, the counters you see with ifconfig eth0 are set to zero > for rx and to 1 for tx. > > So it'

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
According to Andi Kleen: > "Doesn't work" isn't a very useful bug report. What happens exactly? > Do the RX/TX/error counters increase when you try to send packets? no, the counters you see with ifconfig eth0 are set to zero for rx and to 1 for tx. So it's trying to send out data but somehow

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:24:01AM +, Danny ter Haar wrote: > Version number of the driver is the same but it doesn't work. > > Any thoughts anyone ? "Doesn't work" isn't a very useful bug report. What happens exactly? Do the RX/TX/error counters increase when you try to send packets? -An

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
Hans Grobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The softnet changes are most likely the primary source of breakage (for >network drivers). I happen to have a multimedia box from siemens/fujitsu with a cyrix processor, chipset and amd/lance ethernet chipset onboard. It' working fine with 2.2.x but not

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-10 Thread Hans Grobler
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:37:06PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > > > > Aren't you supposed to design the spec BEFORE you implement it? > > Try http://www.firstfloor.org/~andi/softnet (minor details outdated) The softnet changes are most likely the primary source

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-10 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:37:06PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > At 03:01 PM 01/10/2001, Hans Grobler wrote: > >On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dennis wrote: > > > At 02:57 PM 01/09/2001, Dennis wrote: > > > >Where might one find the definitive document on porting device drivers to > > > >2.4 kernels? > > > > > > s

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-10 Thread Dennis
At 03:01 PM 01/10/2001, Hans Grobler wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dennis wrote: > > At 02:57 PM 01/09/2001, Dennis wrote: > > >Where might one find the definitive document on porting device drivers to > > >2.4 kernels? > > > > should I assume that there are none? > >I don't think anyone has had th

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-10 Thread Hans Grobler
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dennis wrote: > At 02:57 PM 01/09/2001, Dennis wrote: > >Where might one find the definitive document on porting device drivers to > >2.4 kernels? > > should I assume that there are none? I don't think anyone has had the time yet. I'm sure someone will get around to this soon

Re: Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-10 Thread Dennis
At 02:57 PM 01/09/2001, Dennis wrote: >Where might one find the definitive document on porting device drivers to >2.4 kernels? > >DB should I assume that there are none? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pleas

Drivers under 2.4

2001-01-09 Thread Dennis
Where might one find the definitive document on porting device drivers to 2.4 kernels? DB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/