On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:37:06PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > > > > Aren't you supposed to design the spec BEFORE you implement it? > > Try http://www.firstfloor.org/~andi/softnet (minor details outdated) The softnet changes are most likely the primary source of breakage (for network drivers). You should also read the kernel-* docs under Documentation/DocBook (see Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt). -- Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Succ... Alan Cox
- Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. ... Silviu Marin-Caea
- Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2... Alan Cox
- Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
- suser checks in 2.2.x Bosko Radivojevic
- Re: suser checks in 2.2.x Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andi Kleen
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andi Kleen
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andrew Morton
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar
- Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler
- PRoblem with pcnet32 under ... Danny ter Haar