Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-03-01 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:27 +1000, Jarne Cook wrote: >On Tuesday 01 March 2005 12:35, you wrote: >> On Monday 28 February 2005 21:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000, Jarne Cook said: >> > > They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. >> > >

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-03-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Mar 01, 2005, at 22:27, Jarne Cook wrote: Damn Having to configure the interfaces using bonding was not really the answer I was expecting. I did not think linux would be that rigid. I figured if poodoze is able to do it (seamlessly mind you), surely linux (with some tinkering) would be able

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-03-01 Thread Jarne Cook
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 12:35, you wrote: > On Monday 28 February 2005 21:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000, Jarne Cook said: > > > They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. > > > Same network. They both end up with gateway=192.168.0.1,

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-03-01 Thread Jarne Cook
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 12:35, you wrote: > On Monday 28 February 2005 21:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000, Jarne Cook said: > > > They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. > > > Same network. They both end up with gateway=192.168.0.1,

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-02-28 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 28 February 2005 21:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000, Jarne Cook said: > > > They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. Same > > network. They both end up with gateway=192.168.0.1, netmask=255.255.255.0. > > > > But ofcourse

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-02-28 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000, Jarne Cook said: > They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. Same > network. They both end up with gateway=192.168.0.1, netmask=255.255.255.0. > But ofcourse they do not have the same IP addresses. I don't suppose your network peo

Re: Complicated networking problem

2005-02-28 Thread Robert Hancock
Jarne Cook wrote: Is there a way to allow an application which has bound to wlan0 (192.168.0.202) and an application bound to eth0 (192.168.0.238) both have access to the internet at the same time, and not require an application to bind to a different local address? I'm not sure exactly what you

Complicated networking problem

2005-02-27 Thread Jarne Cook
Hello all (I am not subscribed. Please CC me) Please forgive me if I have posed this message in the wrong place. I have been searching for the answer for days with no resolve. The question is: How do I get eth0 and wlan0 both working together. They are both using dhcp to the same simple n