On 27.05.2018 22:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://pat
On 27.05.2018 22:35, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is broke
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
>>> implementation is broken:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.c
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c499696e7901bda18385ac
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c499696e7901bda18385ac723b7bd27c3a4af624#diff-a2b6f8d89e18de600e873ac
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c499696e7901bda18385ac723b7bd27c3a4af624#diff-a2b6f8d89e18de600e873ac3ac43fa1d
Florians comment:
c499696e7901bda18
On 05/23/2018 11:27 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those pat
On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e980
On 05/23/2018 11:11 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger w
On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/20
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>> And in the future (time plan)?
>> If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
>>
>> https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
>>
>>
>
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
and you have to change the part of drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> e
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged pvid)
br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 unt
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
> >>
> >> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> >> untagged pvid)
> >>
> >> br1 <=> eth0.102
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>>
>> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
>> untagged pvid)
>>
>> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
>
> Do you even nee
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> untagged pvid)
>
> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
Do you even need these vlans?
Are you doing this for port separat
Hello,
I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
any problems.
Kernel: 4.16.7-100.fc26.armv7hl
b53_common: found switch:
Hi,
On 05/22/2018 12:11 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
> 26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
> works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
> any problems
24 matches
Mail list logo
